| From: | "Chrysanthos Kanellopoulos" <xchrysk-at-otenet.gr> |
| Subject: | Neil's tracks [TANKS] |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:35:15 +0300 |
| Reply-To: | tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
|
Well, you won't know if the two mms
-away-from-the-rim-rule works in your case. The friction system assists
everything so it is not the pins that really push the track and teh tracks have
to be tensioned for the friction to work. If the pins can help, say
another 20% to a more rigid system, and prevent slippage, even better. Mathew
uses longer bolts I think. I think that all 3 Britons will be using successfully
their own version of teh system adopted to their techniques and personal style.
Which proves how things evolve as people work independently..... all the better.
As in a previous message, I knew the system can be improved. Mathew has new
plans.
Currently designing a BT-7 / T-34 hinge track, with
one, long and 6 mm thick bolt in the middle - for guide horn. Crude and
basic as hell. No chance this one will throw a track. PLus, it will help
to avoid the unsightly guide plates.
Chrys
Well, you might not think much of this but I`ve got one pin on its own on
the drive
wheel,i was just wondering, how it would work. The single pin just connects with the end of the track guides (M4 bolts) and it works fine,or better than fine. have a see. http://s224.photobucket.com/albums/dd267/neroc1/?action=view¤t=071015th.jpg sometimes the pin hits the top of the track guides. and pushes that hinge off the drive wheel a bit.but not enough to throw the track,(yet),there are plenty of other guides to hold everything in place. so Im quite happy with a pin/friction "combi" system. Chyrs I`ve totally ignored the 2mm from the edge advice.maybe I`ll pay for this later. we`ll see. Neil R |