| From: | "Stacy Hilton" <stacyj-at-defnet.com> |
| Subject: | Re: 1:6 [TANKS] |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:52:12 -0400 |
| Reply-To: | tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
|
Chrys,
I've been watching you
Ha-Go for quite a while now. Yes, you are correct. My BT-7 will be a bit
longer than 3 feet in length when complete. I only brought up the 1/6th
scale issue because I thought it unfair that a tank could be built much smaller
than it would be at 1/6th scale and still be able to retain the "maximum"
paintball capacity and number of hits to kill it. Meanwhile, tanks
that would actually be 1/6th scale at three feet are penalized by paintball
capacity or hits to kill or both. I thought heavily about your small
tank. I also considered those building very large tanks in 1/6th
scale like Aahz, among a few others. I have no intention of angering
anyone, I just thought it worth mentioning. Also, if size has no
advantage, why have a 3 foot rule? I don't want to get chewed out again,
so I'm going to drop this. I fully accept the rules as they
are. If a 3 foot Tiger can kill my 3 foot BT-7 with 2 shots, so be
it. Even if it takes 4 shots for me to kill him.
The Ha-Go looks sharp, by
the way!
Paul
Hilton.
|