[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
Martin Helsing <martin.helsing-at-earthlink.net> |
|
Subject: |
Re: Paul one motor drive [TANKS] |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:31:27 -0400 (GMT-04:00) |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
yes. thats it.
I wasnt thinking of multiple clutches. just 1 per side.
looking at teh clutches on the website you listed earlier this week, how would I
source clutches to accomplish that?
thanks,
martin
-----Original Message-----
>From: Stacy Hilton <stacyj-at-defnet.com>
>Sent: Sep 27, 2007 10:07 AM
>To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
>Subject: Re: Paul one motor drive [TANKS]
>
>There are a few advantages. First, and most important for me, space. I
>don't have room in my narrow hull for two scooter motors of any size.
>Second, I can take advantage of cheap scooter motors and speed controls, not
>all of which are reversible. Third, smaller relays. It takes a lot less
>amperage to run a clutch than to start a motor. These are the "big three"
>anyway.
>
>Paul Hilton.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Clark Ward Jr" <ki4gyt-at-gmail.com>
>To: <tanks-at-rctankcombat.com>
>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:07 AM
>Subject: Re: Paul one motor drive [TANKS]
>
>
>>I believe it's doable, but I don't see the advantage. Of course, I
>> just woke up, and haven't had my coffee yet.
>>
>> --
>> Clark
>> M60A1 "the Beast" under construction
>> FT-17 "Frenchy" also U/C
>> www.rc-artwerks.com
>> KI4GYT
>> --
>> Why do tankers call infantry "Crunchies"??? Because they ARE!!!
>>
>
>