[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: sasquevaneach-at-aim.com
Subject: Re: Matthew, Pete, Chris and Chrys [TANKS] (0)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:56:24 -0400
Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com

That's really helpful, Chrys- I wondered what the problem with front sprockets was- mine goes at the back, then.

I've just received my 200 hinges, but due to a small error in the ordering department (ie me) they are brass-plated rather than zinc-plated. This will give my tank an interesting Gothic Revival feel (or else I'll just paint the tracks).

Not much time over the weekend but I did manage to reduce 4 roadwheels to the correct width to fit the track.

Phil


-----Original Message-----
From: Chrysanthos Kanellopoulos <xchrysk-at-otenet.gr>
To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
Sent: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 3.25pm
Subject: Re Matthew, Pete, Chris and Chrys [TANKS] (0)

>"the drive sprockets on a Locust are at the front?"
>Not on my Locust there not,actually Chrys told me to do a back drive sys if using
>KTS (hinges(Im not sure if KTS is catching on)).
 
I am facing a small problem when I try to accelerate in reverse., which is the same like having the drive sprocket on the front. You'd have a bigger problem if you tried to climb an obstacle with a front drive sprocket and no compensating idlers. Think KTS and loose tracks = think T-34 drive system and be simple. Lots of tolerance between crudely fit parts. This is not a chain roller system track.
 
CHrys

Get a FREE AOL Email account with unlimited storage. Plus, share and store photos and experience exclusively recorded live music Sessions from your favourite artists. Click Here for more information.