Re: modern armour (was aluminum cutting question) [TANKS]

[JOHN PITTELLI <jplily-at-yahoo.com>]

--- Clark Ward Jr <ki4gyt-at-gmail.com> wrote:

> .  Realistically, it
> shouldn't ignore hits
> from the front.   BUT...  part of the attraction to
> RC tank combat for
> me is the simplicity of the rules, and I'd rather
> battle with a little
> unreality :) than make the rules complex.  Making
> more rules creates
> more problems than it solves.  Absolutely keep them
> simple and fun and
> I'll go with whatever Frank says :)
> 
> -- 
> You're absolutely right. After all,the Tiger could
and did realistically penetrate the frontal armor of
most of it's contemporaries.  And the Abrams would do
so against all WWII armor.By keeping the rules
simpler, it makes for a greater variety of vehicles on
the field.

John


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather