[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: "Doug Conn" <dwconn404-at-comcast.net>
Subject: RE: Bring on the infantry [TANKS]
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:36:31 -0500
Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com

All this infantry talk has raised a rules question in my mind. Infantry can
have a single-shot bazooka type armament, right ? So they shoot their rocket
and then what ? Do they need to get loaded on a supply vehicle and taken to
a supply base to reload ? Then dropped off again ? How does it work ?

        Thanks,
        Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
Behalf Of lionelandme-at-aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 6:45 PM
To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
Subject: Re: Bring on the infantry [TANKS]

I see you are also a lego nut. So am I. I attempted three times in one 
weekend to make a bi-pedaled mecha but it did not due so well. I NEED 
MORE PARTS!

-----Original Message-----
From: sockless67-at-gmail.com
To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
Sent: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Bring on the infantry [TANKS]

    haha im building prototype walkers with my bionicales and testing 
them out by moving  thier legs with my hands... its not rocket science 
but i works, im up to my second prototype right now, i wish i could 
show you pictures but i cant find my camera

-Greg "rocket scientist"  Kampjes

On 1/30/07, strangebut-at-aol.com < strangebut-at-aol.com> wrote:  The thing 
about anime is, it doesn't have to work!
  
  There is not a great deal out there on the Internet, as far as I can 
see, for walking robots per se. There are shops that sell equipment 
such as this one:  
http://www.robotstore.com/store/product.asp?pid=235&catid=1562; I've 
found another in the UK which will be more convenient for me.
  
  What there is in terms of walkers tends to be electronics-based 
programmables, whereas I am looking basically for a mechanical 
solution. This is simply because I'd rather spend my evenings fiddling 
around with bits of metal and plastic rather than trying to learn 
programming.
  
  The two big issues as I see it are speed and stability. To get 
stability you need big feet, unless you are going to have an onboard 
gyroscope (bulky and heavy) I have calculated that if I have a centre 
of gravity (CG) 18 cm from the ground, then an 8cm diameter foot should 
be able to cope with an obstacle as thick as a pencil (6mm). The foot 
will probaably be circular, so that it can turn to provide steering.
  
  Speed is important. The clockwork robot I had as a child (you can 
still get them on ebay) used a simple cam system for the feet which was 
fine, but very slow- each pace advanced the robot less than 1 cm. I am 
trying to achieve 13 cm paces which at 2 paces a second will give me a 
real speed of about .49 mph- that's nearly 3mph at scale speed, a brisk 
walking pace. I doubt if I will actually be able to achieve more than 
1-1.5 paces per minute, but we shall see. 13 cm paces seems to be the 
maximum i can obtain with a robot which has 22cm legs on a 2cm radius 
cam.
  
  If people are interested and when I get a moment, I can put up photos 
of my current 2 test rigs.
  
 Phil





________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and 
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from 
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.