[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
Frank Pittelli <frank-at-rctankcombat.com> |
|
Subject: |
Re: C6C Cant Wait Any Longer [TANKS] |
|
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:46:15 -0500 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
Milenko wrote:
> OK, I guess it's not as big a deal as I figured it would be. I assumed
> that if I just ran wires into the turrent from the hull that the wires
> would get all twisted up as the turret spun around.
Yes, the wires do eventually get all twisted up ... after about 20+ full
revolutions!!
It's not the twisting the bothers some people, it's the fact that they
have to remember to disconnect the wires when they remove the turret.
The way my tank is designed (with a flip up top), I don't have to
disconnect the wires that often, so it's not been a problem. Sure, I've
pulled it off once or twice without remembering, but that's why I use
sturdy connectors :-)
> Next dumb question: has anyone taken apart a wireless gamepad reciever
> and tried to attach an antenna of some kind? I wonder if having a R/C
> reciever-style antenna would extend the range of the gamepad? At least
> getting the reciever out of the hull and allowing for line of sight with
> the gamepad might increase distance as well.
With 2.4Ghz signals, the antenna can very small (an inch or so) and is
therefore built into the receiver housing for short range applications.
In theory, it's possible to replace that by another antenna, but
we're talking about some finely tuned designs. Change the resistive
properties or effective antenna length improperly and the reception will
decrease very quickly.
Also, the 2.4Ghz signal goes in both directions (the gamepad and
"receiver" are both "transceivers") so you'd have to make the
modification on both ends to increase the range.
Finally, since gamepads are targeted for the inexpensive mass market,
you can be sure they only generate enough power to do the job inside the
average gaming environment. So, bigger antennas may not get you much
more distance anyway.
For now, the 50 foot radius has proven sufficient in actual battlefield
situations. Battlers rarely try to operate their vehicles from further
away because aiming is difficult enough when you're right behind the thing.
Frank P.