[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: <bigboom-at-adelphia.net>
Subject: RE: new[TANKS]
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:27:42 -0800
Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com

i am in the process of a large scale gas sherman tank
---- Thomas Lum <tlum-at-mac.com> wrote: 
> "That's one thing I just had to live with. I know the tank I picked 
> makes a wonderful target due to its size but there aren't that many 
> other players close to me so as enthusiastic as I am about playing it's 
> not going to see live paint all that often so it doesn't worry me much."
> 
> That's my biggest regret about the size, three battles a year versus a gigantic 
>tank in the garage, I might just switch!
> 
> 
>  
> On Wednesday, November 08, 2006, at 06:22PM, "Martin A.M." <martin-at-kmfk.no> 
>wrote:
> >Bigger tanks has more armor and they need to be sot more times to get
> >destroyed... hehe.. Like a Tiger and Sherman in WW2... :)
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
> >Behalf Of Aahz.
> >Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:13 AM
> >To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
> >Subject: Re: new[TANKS]
> >
> >Thomas Lum wrote:
> >> At 1/6 scale, the tank w/o cannon was 52 inches long and 15.5 inches tall,
> >a virtual billboard for paintball shooting.
> >
> >    That's one thing I just had to live with. I know the tank I picked 
> >makes a wonderful target due to its size but there aren't that many 
> >other players close to me so as enthusiastic as I am about playing it's 
> >not going to see live paint all that often so it doesn't worry me much. 
> >I am however worried about the roller chain just as you are but I cross 
> >that bridge when I get to it. I just got the material for the chassis 
> >today, yay!
> >
> >Aahz.
> >
> >
> >__________ NOD32 1.1859 (20061108) Information __________
> >
> >This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
> >