RE: new[TANKS]

[Thomas Lum <tlum-at-mac.com>]

"That's one thing I just had to live with. I know the tank I picked 
makes a wonderful target due to its size but there aren't that many 
other players close to me so as enthusiastic as I am about playing it's 
not going to see live paint all that often so it doesn't worry me much."

That's my biggest regret about the size, three battles a year versus a gigantic tank 
in the garage, I might just switch!


 
On Wednesday, November 08, 2006, at 06:22PM, "Martin A.M." <martin-at-kmfk.no> wrote:
>Bigger tanks has more armor and they need to be sot more times to get
>destroyed... hehe.. Like a Tiger and Sherman in WW2... :)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
>Behalf Of Aahz.
>Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:13 AM
>To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
>Subject: Re: new[TANKS]
>
>Thomas Lum wrote:
>> At 1/6 scale, the tank w/o cannon was 52 inches long and 15.5 inches tall,
>a virtual billboard for paintball shooting.
>
>    That's one thing I just had to live with. I know the tank I picked 
>makes a wonderful target due to its size but there aren't that many 
>other players close to me so as enthusiastic as I am about playing it's 
>not going to see live paint all that often so it doesn't worry me much. 
>I am however worried about the roller chain just as you are but I cross 
>that bridge when I get to it. I just got the material for the chassis 
>today, yay!
>
>Aahz.
>
>
>__________ NOD32 1.1859 (20061108) Information __________
>
>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>