[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: "Martin A.M." <martin-at-kmfk.no>
Subject: RE: new[TANKS]
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:22:09 +0100
Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com

Bigger tanks has more armor and they need to be sot more times to get
destroyed... hehe.. Like a Tiger and Sherman in WW2... :)

-----Original Message-----
From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
Behalf Of Aahz.
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:13 AM
To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
Subject: Re: new[TANKS]

Thomas Lum wrote:
> At 1/6 scale, the tank w/o cannon was 52 inches long and 15.5 inches tall,
a virtual billboard for paintball shooting.

    That's one thing I just had to live with. I know the tank I picked 
makes a wonderful target due to its size but there aren't that many 
other players close to me so as enthusiastic as I am about playing it's 
not going to see live paint all that often so it doesn't worry me much. 
I am however worried about the roller chain just as you are but I cross 
that bridge when I get to it. I just got the material for the chassis 
today, yay!

Aahz.


__________ NOD32 1.1859 (20061108) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com