[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
"Martin A.M." <martin-at-kmfk.no> |
|
Subject: |
RE: new[TANKS] |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:22:09 +0100 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
Bigger tanks has more armor and they need to be sot more times to get
destroyed... hehe.. Like a Tiger and Sherman in WW2... :)
-----Original Message-----
From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
Behalf Of Aahz.
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:13 AM
To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
Subject: Re: new[TANKS]
Thomas Lum wrote:
> At 1/6 scale, the tank w/o cannon was 52 inches long and 15.5 inches tall,
a virtual billboard for paintball shooting.
That's one thing I just had to live with. I know the tank I picked
makes a wonderful target due to its size but there aren't that many
other players close to me so as enthusiastic as I am about playing it's
not going to see live paint all that often so it doesn't worry me much.
I am however worried about the roller chain just as you are but I cross
that bridge when I get to it. I just got the material for the chassis
today, yay!
Aahz.
__________ NOD32 1.1859 (20061108) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com