[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Doug Conn" <dwconn404-at-comcast.net>
RE: AC004 Designation [TANKS] - Rating question
Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:27:41 -0400
Whew ! Scared me. I knew I was too slow with that 'registration fee'.
I couldn't find any specific armor thickness measurements for the armor
up-grade kit, but this site talks all about the capabilities of the HMMWV
For what it's worth, I think a 2 defensive rating is fair, reasonable, and
it's what I was expecting.
This vehicle's call sign will be "Rocket Man".
From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
Behalf Of Frank Pittelli
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: AC004 Designation [TANKS] - Rating question
Doug Conn wrote:
> Does 1/2 rating on AC004 mean that it can only store a single shot before
> reloading ? I thought with an AC designation there would be a 20 shot
Typo. I've changed it to 20/2 which is correct for an Armored Car with
> I've been thinking about dropping a Staghound T-17E3
> (http://www.wwiivehicles.com/usa/armored_cars/t17_armoredcars.html) body
> the chassis instead of the HMMWV. That vehicle had a 75mm gun. If I do
> will it get a 40 shot magazine ?
As shown in the table for Rule III.3, the 70+ dividing line is only for
"tanks". Armored cars always get a 20 shot magazine, regardless of the
BTW: Do you know the "armor" rating for the M1045A2. I could only find
a reference to "44 Grain" and I'm not sure what that means.
Also, you need to pick a callsign if you want any respect on the