[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
"jon s kowitz" <jonskowitz-at-hotmail.com> |
|
Subject: |
Re: Track limits [TANKS] |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:09:36 +0000 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
So who needs a CNC router to make a sproketed TTS? Made mine with some
paper printouts clued to plywood, a drill press, a small reciprocating saw,
and a wood rasp. Just takes a bit of patience and some understanding that
it won't LOOK perfect but mine's functioned quite reliably for some time now
(T036 if you wanna take a gander).
>From: "Milenko" <milenko-at-king-nerd.com>
>Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
>To: <tanks-at-rctankcombat.com>
>Subject: Re: Track limits [TANKS]
>Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:44:41 -0500
>
>Sorry to go slightly off topic, but what do you mean by cumbersome chain
>tracks? I am kind of stuck right now trying to figure out if I should use
>attachment chain or build a TTS. I don't have access to a CNC router, so
>building the sprockets will be difficult. Also, it looks like it would
>take some time to make the track pieces. The attachment chain looks much
>easier to assemble and I assume it will hold up well against abuse. The
>thing that I'm really worried about though is which one can handle speed
>better. I am building a 1/6 abrams, which is a rather large tank. It's
>not heavy yet, but I'm guessing it will be once it's done. I plan on using
>EVWs or EVXs running at 24V geared 9:1. I once I find out if the motors
>can turn the tank in grass, mud, etc I may change that to 6:1.
>
>Does anyone have any input on whether the attachment chain will hold up to
>this speed/abuse? It would be so much easier for me to use the chain, but
>if you guys think it won't work well for my situation then I'll try to
>build a TTS.
>
>Jeremy "Need a good track system" Adams
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: toast
> To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:11 PM
> Subject: RE: Track limits [TANKS]
>
>
> It's the efficiency of his drivetrain. His tracks are well built and
>offer little resistance. His tracks are sprocket driven with out being
>cumbersome chain tracks. He's Steve Freak'n Tyng (yes that's his middle
>name according to my research).
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com]
>On Behalf Of Derek Engelhaupt
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
> Subject: Re: Track limits [TANKS]
>
>
>
> From what I can see is that it's light and is geared a little higher.
>It's running at 24V.
>
>
>
> Derek
>
> BrendanKotlanger-at-aol.com wrote:
>
> What is so special about the cromwell that makes it go faster then all
>of the other tanks with EV warriors? Is it the 24 volts? Is the tank
>light weight? Do the tracks have anything to do with it? Does the active
>suspension make it run faster?
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Mail
> Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.6/286 - Release Date: 3/20/2006