[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: Barry Irick <scrocks-at-sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Size of Comet and Cromwell [TANKS]
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com

Actually I like the idea of someone doing different tanks.  Considered Churchill also, as well as the Matilda II, and Chi-Ha.  LOT of bogies.
 
Barry
Semovente 75/18 (in progress)

Marc en Wendy <marcmethorst-at-zonnet.nl> wrote:
Chris wrote:
 
> I'm a bit disappointed to hear that you are building a churchill, the
> ugliest tank of all time. Once you really study this afv you will notice
> after building a magnificent piece of engineering splendor (StuG) that it is
> primitive in comparison.;-)
I have always liked early WW2 armour and since I'd like to build a better detailed tank I chose the Churchill for it's complexity in detail, also because it hasn't been built in the hobby yet. The exposed tracks are absolutely great and the road wheel lay out is very special.

> Seriously though you could build the hull into the tracks which will give
> you plenty of room on either side. The gun is also nice and low so good
> clearance for a hopper.
I noticed, this will give me a lot more space then the StuG.
 
John wrote:
 
> The Comet was built to 1:6 scale. The interior chassis measurements are 12.75 width, 6.25 height and
> 38 length with a 1.5 overhang area in the rear. These are inches of course.
 
Thanks John, it shows that it is just a bit wider then my StuG.
 
Marc