Re: New to tanks. [TANKS]

[himself-at-adamwells.net]

I think he meant the E-100 was ridiculous... it's a downright enormous tank 
that was supposed to carry a 75mm gun with 200 rounds of ammo as a secondary(!) 
in a coax mount.

As for the E-10, I can only picture a tank destroyer hopping around on 
pneumatic shocks with a 1/6 scale Snoop Dogg action figure on top... lol In all 
seriousness, though, I believe the Swedish S tank that mentioned was very 
similiar in design and was an actual production tank... though I think it 
raised and lowered itself to elevate it's main gun.

Quoting Michael Kouridakis <mrdingleberry-at-comcast.net>:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Chris-- What exactly is ridiculous about it? 
> I build to please myself.  It would be nice if I could battle with it but
> if I can't then se la vie (or la guerre as the case may be).
> Mike
> 
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From:
>   chris
>   barthelson
>   To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
>   Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 8:11
>   PM
>   Subject: Re: New to tanks. [TANKS]
> 
> >perhaps a design review - exception process?
> 
> >It does look cool
> 
> The problem is that most of the crazy non production tanks look real cool,
> E-100, E-10, E-25, they are all very cool looking tanks. I was actually
> thinking of building an e-100 as a side project just for the sake of
> building something cool, but I would rather spend time on something that can
> get a designation # and be battled( not to mention its ridiculous)
> 
> Chris. b
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> realestate.com.au: the biggest address in property
> http://ninemsn.realestate.com.au
> 
>   E100_05.jpg
> 
> 
> 
>   No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free
>   Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date:
>   12/2/2005
> 
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 12/2/2005
> 
> 
>