[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
Derek Engelhaupt <derekengelhaupt-at-rocketmail.com> |
|
Subject: |
Re: Sheridan M551 [TANKS] |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:19:35 -0800 (PST) |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
We have a fully operational one at the Ft. Snelling Military Museaum
here in Minnapolis where I volunteer. If I have some time during the
next meeting, I could probably get you some measurements of it. What
would you need to get you started?
Derek
--- Jesse Lands <jglands-at-bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:11:28 -0400
> "John Barager" <gogetta20-at-hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Sorry it's small, but it's all I got.
> > Personally I think the M551 is, well, not a very good tank. It's
> got
> > alot of problems and very few advantages. It could have been
> better
> > employed with a 120mm breechloading mortar in place of that 152mm
> > monster, and used as an assault gun in support of light infantry
> > formations.
> >
> > - John
>
> Thanks.
>
> I would agree that it is not a very good tank. It's intent was to
> be a
> recon and multipurpose vehicle. I believe the original concept and
> idea was sound, but how it was used and employed was not. Probably
> the
> closest way to the correct employment was it's last combat unit at
> Bragg. Using it as a quick response infantry support was correct.
>
> Thanks again
> Jesse
> --
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com