[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: |
Grant Mahalek <gmahalek-at-shaw.ca> |
Subject: |
Re: High-Low gears [TANKS] |
Date: |
Sat, 07 May 2005 08:02:35 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
Hi Jon,
You seem to have a good grasp of all things "torque".... Perhaps you can
offer your comments on my power set-up for my Hetzer.
Equipment:
-two new scooter motors; Unite Motor, Model MY1016, 24VDC, 2750rpm, 15.4amp,
280watt; 11 tooth #25 drive sprockets
-or two used wheel chair motors with right angle gear drives, 24VDC(no other
information)
-4 inch dia. rubber drive wheels
-"Tyning Track System"
-fixed road wheels
-12VDC/14.4AH or 24VDC/14.4AH or 12VDC/32AH or 24VDC/32AH, gel cel batteries
-Anvilus proportional relay SSR controller with 12VDC relays and 40Amp
Crydom SSR's
Objective:
-maximum speed 6 to 10 mph
-all up weight; as light as possible
-do not want to over-amp motors
-do not want to over-volt or over-amp the controller or wiring
I remember a robot/drive-train calculation program/website....but I don't
remember the website....how is your recall?
Anyone else want to throw in their "two cents...". Much appreciated!
Again, thanks for all your help!
Grant
"unregistered" Northern Barbarian
--- Original Message -----
From: "jon s kowitz" <jonskowitz-at-hotmail.com>
To: <tanks-at-rctankcombat.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: High-Low gears [TANKS]
>
> Motor torque does not equal Sprocket torque. Your transmission will act
> as a lever, so the EV Warriors in your T-34 (wonderful job on that tank
> btw) that you've got stalled and smoking are producing thier maximum motor
> torque. Because of the 9:1 transmission ratio however, the force being
> applied ot the tracks by the sprocket is 9x the motor's force. If your
> transmission had a 21:1 ratio then you'd be applying 21x that force (and
> this is the point things start exploding). Or, that same
> motor/transmission combo could produce the same torque as the stalled
> motor at 9:1, only it'd still be turning, using less power and generating
> less heat.
>
> I think what we want to do is how to vary the transmission ratios between
> maximum speed and maximum power in a cost-effective manner, and solving
> all of the technical challenges that go with it.
>
>>Any decent DC speed controller will use pulse width modulation (PWM) to
>>control a motors speed. PWM controls a motors speed by pulsing the
>>current to the motor at a constant rate (modulation) and varies the pulse
>>width from 0% to 100%. At full power the pulses meet and become one long
>>stream of constant current. There is no reduction of voltage to the
>>motor, only a variable reduction of time when current is available to the
>>motor. This all happens several thousand times a second so looks very
>>smooth at the motor end. The big advantage PWM has over a resistance type
>>of speed control is that excess voltage is not shaved off and wasted as
>>heat thus conserving battery power. As this relates to the question at
>>hand concerning a multiple ratio transmission. You should consider that
>>an electric motor produces its maximum amount of torque at 0 RPM (i.e.
>>when stalled) and the least amount of torque at it's max RPM. So in the
>>example sited (rough terrain, skid steering, etc.) a PWM controlled
>>electric drivetrain optimized to give you the top speed performance
>>desired will still have the most available torque at close to stall
>>conditions (skid steer in tall grass as an example). At least that's how
>>I understand it and I'm no expert.
>>
>>Steve Tyng
>>
>
>
>