[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
"jon s kowitz" <jonskowitz-at-hotmail.com> |
|
Subject: |
Re: engine question [TANKS] |
|
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 02:28:37 +0000 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
I didn't say that they didn't really make sense (it's what I'm going to
try using) but I'm simply pointing out the potential difficulties I see from
thier use. At 150 rpm, you need an overdrive ratio of about 1:3 to produce
the 400 rpm sprocket speed needed for 4 - 5 mph (assuming a 4" / 10cm
sprocket). This will decrease sprocket torque to 1/3 of motor torque (which
is why you need to keep the tank as lightweight as possible), though using
multiple motors to drive each track may help (which will up the amperage
your relays will need to carry, don't have any data on amp draw yet though).
Of course, the motors are very lightweight and compact, plus it's a lot
more appealing to try over-volting a pair of motors you picked up for $5 at
a junkyard than it is a $150 DeWalt or a "soon-to-be-priceless" Warrior.
I'll have some more data available on overvolting these motors in a couple
of weeks (need more $$$ for batteries to test with). Also, if the amp-draw
turns out to be significantly less then you might be able to get away with a
smaller battery (further lightening the chassis).
BTW- another advantage of these motors is that they seem to be extremely
plentiful. I noticed today that a '95 Ford F800 medium truck uses the exact
same motor, which means finding matching copies will be very simple to do.
Hopefully I'll have a rolling chassis finished by the end of March or
April and we can get some "real-world" testing done on them.