[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anyone considered Tin?
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:58:23 -0500
A 13-1 kill ratio sounds a little big for a tank that fell on it side, and
could barly turn depenading on the terain. All the same its a cool tank I
must admitt. On the other hand those machine guns on the side were not
worthless against other tanks of the day, remeber they in many cases fired
armour pierceing rounds, in at least one engagment that I know of two mark
IV females were forced to leave a battle with A7V after having big wholes
blown in thier sides.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Barager" <gogetta20-at-hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone considered Tin?
> Well, if you decide to build one, drop me an e-mail or post something
> here, I'sd be more then happy to help. And spam this mailing list with A7V
> info, lol.
> But if it's far enough in the future (A a year or so) then I'll send you a
> copy of the book I am working on of the A7V.
> Although I have to admit, it would be really cool to have a pair of A7V
> replicas in the battlefeild. Please don;t make the "generalization"
> mistake.. I hate that. All 20 A7V's were different in appearance for
> various reasons.
> And I'm using the single gun in the front. All 6 other guns are Maxim
> 08/15 Machine guns, and thus worthless as a main armament.
> - John "Uber-Strumpanzerwagen nerd" Barager.
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "chris barthelson" <barthelson88-at-hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
> To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
> Subject: Re: Anyone considered Tin?
> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:47:15 +1030
> It certainly would be an impressive tank to see cruising the battlefield!
> I think my next tank should be an A7V I've always liked them. Are you
> going to use the front gun or the side two? If I build one I'll just use
> the front gun as it would be easier to build.
> Check Hoyts movie times via SMS: