Re: Anyone considered Tin?

["John Barager" <gogetta20-at-hotmail.com>]

1/6th. And actually, it wouldn't be any bigger then the T-34 or Tiger. Plus 
it has alot of advantages (Narrow forward profile, lots of space, etc.).
And as I am apparetly an expert in the A7V, I thought it would be easy (And 
it will be).

Besides, durring WW1, the A7V scored something like a 13:1 kill ratio 
against Allied tanks, don;t you agree it would be fitting to have it fight 
the Mk.V?

Anyway... yea, I'm seriously considering rivited aluminum, besides, it would 
add the metalic part to it.

- John "Boxy German Tanks are my fetish, lol" Barager

PS: for those who're interested, I'm making an exact external 1/6th replica 
of A7V 561 "Nixe", who was the first tank ever to fight with and to destroy 
another tank in combat.

----Original Message Follows----
From: "chris barthelson" <barthelson88-at-hotmail.com>
Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
Subject: Re: Anyone considered Tin?
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:23:24 +1030

I was thinking of using tin for my next tank. I think tin would work well 
because its pretty easy to work with and is rather strong. I would say 
alluminium would be better because it's lighter but it's also more 
expensive. I considered making an A7V at one stage, they certainly look 
cool. What scale are you making yours in? it would be rather big at 1/6 
wouldn’t it?

Chris. b

_________________________________________________________________
Are you right for each other? Find out with our Love Calculator:  
http://fun.mobiledownloads.com.au/191191/index.wl?page=191191text