[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
adt22-at-drexel.edu |
|
Subject: |
Re: Re:elevation |
|
Date: |
Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:39:01 -0500 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
right, so maximum (semi)accurate distance is a good number and elevate is important
but I still don't think overall maximum distance is relevant unless you are worried
about safety. You aren't going to want to get a 45 degree angle so that you can lob
paint the farthest.
I was playing paintball saturday and I had newbies trying to lob paint at me from
way out of range. Paint is less likely to break in that situation (at least on a
person). Some people even go as far as wearing ghillie (spelling?) suits partially
for camo, and partially for reducing breaks on the body.
Which I think is a cheap cheat.
So I had an idea - someone showed a picture of a tank or something that had cages
around it so that incoming fire would detonate before hitting the vehicle.
Frank, a netting around the tank to "catch" paintballs - legal or illegal?
I'm full of stupid idea and I don't even have a complete tank. :)
I guess you can argue that the grates wouldn't do anything against other tanks and
it was only designed for RPGs?
-Amir "upstart"
----- Original Message -----
From: JOHN PITTELLI <jplily-at-yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, November 7, 2004 11:55 pm
Subject: Re: Re:elevation
> Actually, that is not true. Just ask Joe what it is
> like when the elevate does not work properly. Even
> Steve enjoyed watching one of my shots angle downward
> for a hit on top of a turret. Remember, the better
> your accuracy downrange, the harder it is for the
> enemy to hit you.Will is also very accurate at
> distances up to 50 feet.
>
> John"Mr. Soapbox" Pittelli
>
>
> --- adt22-at-drexel.edu wrote:
>
> > are you worried about safety or accuracy?
> > keep in mind your tank won't always be on flat
> > ground so that number will be almost worthless.
> >
> > -Amir
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: chris barthelson <barthelson88-at-hotmail.com>
> > Date: Sunday, November 7, 2004 5:51 pm
> > Subject: Re:elevation
> >
> > > Cheers John,
> > > I think I will go for the 10. Has anyone tested
> > the maximum
> > > distance at 10
> > > degrees???
> > >
> > > >Chris, Go for the 10 degrees. It really helps to
> > be at
> > > >the max elevation.
> > > >
> > > >John
> > >
> > >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > Click here for the latest chart ringtones:
> > >
> >
> http://ringtones.com.au/ninemsn/control?page=/ninemsn/main.jsp
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
> www.yahoo.com
>
>
>