[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
Frank Pittelli <frank-at-rctankcombat.com> |
|
Subject: |
Re: tranny |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:50:21 -0400 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
chris barthelson wrote:
> hello everyone
> Just a couple of questions. What size shaft should I use for my
> transmission?
Depends on the bearings that you are using. It is sometimes cheaper to
use 5/8" shafts, because that's a fairly common shaft size for garden
equipment, which means that cheap bearings are plentiful. But, if you
may find some bearings for 1/2" that are cheaper, so you'd go with that
shaft size. For example, Steve Tyng found some inexpensive 1/2"
bearings recently, so we'll be using them for our next tranny.
Basically, any shaft that is 3/8" or bigger will work fine.
> And I want a duel stage 9:1 reduction what is the cheapest
> way to achive this???
If you're using chain, you can get 4 pairs of 10-tooth and 30-tooth
sprockets for the tranny. We've used #35 chain because McMaster-Carr
carries a complete line of sprockets, but that's heavier than necessary.
Joe Sommer found a place to order #25 chain, which is more compact and
lighter, but will do the job fine. I'm not sure if there is a price
difference.
Chain is a good solution, but is more expensive than using a two-stage
belt reduction, which is the first tranny we built. When using belts,
we used 4 pairs of 1.5" and 4.5" pulleys to achieve the 9:1 reduction.
Keep in mind, belt trannys need a more complicated mounting system,
because you have to be able to put tension on the belts. Also, because
they are under constant tension, they make the motor work harder and
they need to be adjusted periodically. Finally, belt trannys aren't as
compact as a chain tranny. As always, you've got to tradeoff some
performance to save money upfront.
> And I'm using tts tracks so I dont need any slipage right??
That's correct.
Frank P.
- References:
- tranny
- From: "chris barthelson" <barthelson88-at-hotmail.com>