[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
"Steve Tyng" <stevet-at-stcharlesmd.com> |
|
Subject: |
RE: Hydraulic Drive |
|
Date: |
18 Aug 2004 09:41:00 -0400 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
Frank wrote:
> If anyone out there knows something about hydraulics, please
> give me your opinion on the use of a hydraulic pump (driven
> by an EV Warrior) to drive hydraulic motors that drive the
> tracks and cylinders that control elevate and rotate.
I studied and maintained hydraulic systems in the Navy.
Given the same power source (a battery) a hydraulic vehicle will be heaver and less
efficient, more complex, and more expensive than the equivalent mechanical
transmission vehicle. My reasoning,
Heaver and less efficient:
You are replacing a relatively lightweight and efficient gear or belt/chain
reduction with one hydraulic pump, two hydraulic motors, a reservoir, associated
piping and hydraulic fluid, and of course the control valves. There is a lot of
reciprocating and internal frictional losses in an hydraulic system as compared to a
well conceived roller chain or gear reduction. At rest, a hydraulic vehicles motor
is still running, pumping fluid through a loop and wasting battery power.
Complex:
A hydraulic system will not reduce the amount of control electronics or wiring.
Instead of controlling the direction/speed of motors your controllers/servos will
now be controlling hydraulic directional control valves. Hydraulic piping will be
harder to route than electric wiring. Every pipe fitting is a potential leak point.
Hydraulics does reduce the number of electric motors required but to get the same
power output will require a motor more than twice as powerful as the two it replaced.
More expensive:
Hydraulic components in the size range required for 1:6 scale vehicles are not your
standard surplus store item. Log splitter components are just going to be to big.
I priced a small hydraulic motor suitable for a tank drive motor at $88. For that
price four EV Warriors can be purchased. I haven't looked for miniature control
valves but I can't imagine they would be less expensive than a 40 amp reversing
relay.
Hydraulics start to make sense when your limited to one non-reversible power source
and your vehicle has multiple reversing rotary and reciprocating motion
requirements. A bulldozer is a good example or a gas powered tank if it were
allowed by the rules.
Just my two cents worth.
Steve "I'd build hydraulic for the challenge" Tyng