[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
From: |
"flier" <FLIER-at-sbcglobal.net> |
|
Subject: |
RE: Penn Tracks |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:06:36 -0500 |
|
Reply-To: |
tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
Steve,
That's exactly what I've been thinking. One step
further would be to make the cleat aluminum too.
Basically TIG the cleat to the guide on each end,
slip the belt through and fasten with a couple of
rivets. Or, for even better traction, fasten a piece
of reinforced rubber mat material to the cleat/guide
assembly with the two rivets that secure the assembly
to the belt. The mat material could overhang the
ends of the cleat/guide assy.
Does the space between the inner guide segments cause
any problem with the drive/idler/road wheels
(vibration for instance?)
--- Original Message ---
From: "SteveT44" <SteveT44-at-comcast.net>
To: <tanks-at-rctankcombat.com>
Subject: RE: Penn Tracks
>Kurt wrote,
>
>> Has anyone in the Penn, area checked with Red Zone
Robotics to see who
>makes their tracks??? And the cost???
>
>To me those tracks look like conveyor belting with
cleats and tracking tabs
>attached to it, i.e. a variation of the TTS.
Attached are some pics of an
>idea I've been kicking around. It's a TTS with the
inside tracking pieces
>cut from 3" aluminum channel.
>
>Steve