Re: RE: RE: [Fwd: subscribing to RC Tank Combat]

[adt22-at-drexel.edu]

Are there problems with 802.11b and g?  or is it mainly with g+ and the rest?

I was planning on using 802.11b because its pretty cheap.  I haven't bought any 
wireless parts yet - I'll wait for a group agreement on a standard before I do.

----- Original Message -----
From: XP_ert <xp_ert-at-cox.net>
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:10 am
Subject: RE: RE: [Fwd: subscribing to RC Tank Combat]

> One Known problem is with the 802.11g+ lack of standards. I've also 
> beentoying with the idea in using a Via Mini-ITX motherboard in a 
> tank for quite
> some time now. But back to the problem. The 802.11g+ when running 
> in its
> 108bps mode will cause interference with other devices in the 
> vicinity such
> as 802.11b/g and possibly a. I believe it would be polite to pick a 
> standardfor RC Tank Combat BEFORE this technique becomes popular. I 
> believe 802.11g
> should be used because of its wider bandwidth and compatibility. 
> Just my
> $.02
> 
> 
> 
> PS. The Bradley is still in CAD stage
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
> Behalf Of adt22-at-drexel.edu
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:33 PM
> To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
> Subject: Re: RE: [Fwd: subscribing to RC Tank Combat]
> 
> They're coming out of the woodwork now!
> 
> -Amir
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aahz." <erickkilmer-at-comcast.net>
> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:16 pm
> Subject: RE: [Fwd: subscribing to RC Tank Combat]
> 
> > > Ah, so I'm not the only one who has the dream of integrating 
> > wireless> networking and RC tank Combat:)
> > 
> >     Oh, not by far :)
> > 
> > Aahz. 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>