RE: RE: [Fwd: subscribing to RC Tank Combat]

["XP_ert" <xp_ert-at-cox.net>]

One Known problem is with the 802.11g+ lack of standards. I've also been
toying with the idea in using a Via Mini-ITX motherboard in a tank for quite
some time now. But back to the problem. The 802.11g+ when running in its
108bps mode will cause interference with other devices in the vicinity such
as 802.11b/g and possibly a. I believe it would be polite to pick a standard
for RC Tank Combat BEFORE this technique becomes popular. I believe 802.11g
should be used because of its wider bandwidth and compatibility. Just my
$.02



PS. The Bradley is still in CAD stage

-----Original Message-----
From: tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com [mailto:tanks-admin-at-rctankcombat.com] On
Behalf Of adt22-at-drexel.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:33 PM
To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
Subject: Re: RE: [Fwd: subscribing to RC Tank Combat]

They're coming out of the woodwork now!

-Amir

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aahz." <erickkilmer-at-comcast.net>
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:16 pm
Subject: RE: [Fwd: subscribing to RC Tank Combat]

> > Ah, so I'm not the only one who has the dream of integrating 
> wireless> networking and RC tank Combat:)
> 
>       Oh, not by far :)
> 
> Aahz. 
> 
>