[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: JOHN PITTELLI <jplily-at-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Another rules question:
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 20:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com

Joe: When I looked up the defintion of cowering It did
not say, reloading to plaster the Hetzer again :,).
Thanks for your assistance with the treads. Should
make the IV look nice and run smooth. John" Still
scrubbing off the paint" Pittelli 
--- Joe Sommer <anvilus9-at-adelphia.net> wrote:
> 
> At 11:02 AM 7/10/2003 -0400, Frank Pittelli wrote:
> >One aspect of the last battle that was generally
> agreed by all battlers 
> >was that the 40 round limit really makes you think.
> 
> I agree with Frank 100%.  The 40 round limit worked
> very well.
> 
> >... battlers were only allowed to reload or work on
> their vehicle when (a) 
> >in home base or (b) when a 5-minute timeout was
> called by either team.
> 
> This also worked very well.  Otherwise people will
> be continually
> tinkering with their tanks on the field and stopping
> play at the slightest
> hint of malfunction.
> 
> >However, instead of allowing any number of tanks in
> home-base at a given 
> >time, I think a limit of N (chosen by the CD based
> on the size of the 
> >teams) should be imposed to further require
> battlers to think like a team, 
> >managing the use of home-base effectively.
> 
> This might be useful in that I remember all three of
> the vaunted
> Tri-Pact tanks cowering together in their home base
> on several
> occasions.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> Joe Sommer
> 2378 Nantucket Circle, State College, PA 16803
> 814.234.4773     anvilus9-at-adelphia.net
> http://users.adelphia.net/~anvilus9/
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com