From: | Matt <airdevil85-at-yahoo.com> |
Subject: | Re: Tank Design |
Date: | Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:55:30 -0800 (PST) |
Reply-To: | tanks-at-rctankcombat.com |
must have missed that, Thanks
Christopher Denis <cdenis29-at-msn.com> wrote:
the rules state
"All vehicles and weapon systems must be modeled after a real vehicle or
weapon system that was produced and used in a military conflict anywhere and
at anytime"
>From: Matt
>Reply-To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
>To: tanks-at-rctankcombat.com
>Subject: Tank Design
>Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:21:47 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>Does the tank have to be based on an actual tank, or can I just make up a
>design as long as it fits the specifications, such as the 3 foot length?
>
> Frank Pittelliwrote:Lief G Goodson wrote:
> >
> > I'm a believer that conveyor is the way to go. I'm heading down the
> > plastic conveyor road, but it's expensive! Is the steel conveyor less
> > expensive. Tell us more!
> >
>
>You asked for it ... you got it. I've pulled together the results of
>our recent track testing session and other bits of track building
>information into a tech article posted at:
>
>http://www.rctankcombat.com/articles/track-systems/
>
>That's just the start of what I hope will be a complete compendium of
>various track techniques that emerge in the hobby. As such, if anyone
>has anything else to add in the way of details, photos or analysis,
>please feel free to post it to the mailing list or send it to me
>privately and I'll incorporate the material in the article.
>
>Next article: Drive Systems
>
>Frank "All Tracks Are Cool" Pittelli
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail